Jam: not today and probably not tomorrow for many

Today is an important day in the history of the financing of schools; possibly the most important since the 1988 Education Reform Act heralded the introduction of Local Management of Schools.  Already, there has been the National Audit Office report on ‘Financial sustainability of schools’. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/financial-sustainability-in-schools/

This Report makes the point that, The Department [DfE] can demonstrate using benchmarking that schools should be able to make the required savings in spending on workforce and procurement without affecting educational outcomes, but cannot be assured that these savings will be achieved in practice.

This is because, as everyone knows, the DfE doesn’t actually operate schools directly, although Regional School Commissioners come much closer to doing so that at any time in the recent history of schooling in England.

TeachVac, the free to use job matching site that could significantly reduce the spending by schools on recruitment advertising and also the cost of using agencies to recruit permanent staff that is a growing feature of the marketplace, is a case in point.

Despite being developed by experts in both teacher recruitment and software design it has been shunned by the DfE and also be teacher associations, some of whom acknowledge support from paid recruitment sites on their own web sites. One association has even refused TeachVac permission to take exhibition space at their annual conference in 2017 on the grounds that’ we have sufficient recruiters exhibiting already’!

With such a playing field it is no wonder that driving down costs in schools has been so difficult. Perhaps, now is the time for a sector-wide task force to examine methods of reducing costs to schools through better procurement. In olden times there were benchmark figures for expenditure issued by bodies such as the Association of Education Committees and other similar national bodies. Indeed, such statistics help me compile my article on ‘variations on local authority provision on education’ way back in 1981 at the start of my career.

With the publication later today of the second stage consultation on a National Funding formula it is interesting to look back at the progress made over the past 35 years and to note that differences in funding between schools and authorities was a big issue even then. When the cake isn’t large enough, it is not surprising to find those that want to eat it fighting over the size of their slice.

If floor and ceilings are included in the funding formula consultation, as expected, then as the NAO Report shows, there will be pain for all. Maybe the DfE hasn’t published the ITT allocations for 2017 as they reflect an acceptance of that pain through reduced funding for employment opportunities for teachers?

What is clear that even if life is marginally easier for some schools after the Funding Formula announcement, for many it will be bad news and a real need to pull together to make savings.

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Jam: not today and probably not tomorrow for many

  1. Hi John

    I’ve been following your blog, and I find it very interesting and very informative. It has helped inform me for my chosen research topic choice.

    I am a masters student studying Occupational and Organisational Psychology at the University of East London.

    Despite the current UK teacher shortage crisis, I noticed that there is little UK based research, investigating this phenomena. Many papers were based in America etc… Therefore my study aims to investigate the levels of Professional and Organisational Commitment of general educational teachers, in London schools; and identify whether these are the potential causes of teachers’ intent to leave.

    I was wondering if you could signpost me to online forums etc, whereby I can find teachers who would be interested in completing my questionnaire. it should roughly only take 5 mins and its completely anonymous.

    You will find the link to the anonymous online survey below:

    Professional and Organisational Commitment of Teachers Survey

    I have also attached to this email, an Information Letter and consent form for participants. They can email me back the completed consent forms, to my student email: u1000279@uel.ac.uk.

    Thanking you in advance for your help.

    Evalyn Powell

    ________________________________

    • Evalyn,

      I don’t think I can read attachments to comments on this blog. Your study sounds interesting and I will hope readers will get in touch with you to ask for a copy of the questionnaire. A quick trawl on the internet should provide you with sufficient online forums to generate enough responses.

      Good luck, and do let me know your findings.

      John Howson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s