Recruitment Controls 4

They say that there is nothing like a bit of publicity to help the marketing along. Recruitment to teaching preparation courses hasn’t been short of that this autumn. First, there was the furore, anxiety, concern – insert your own choice of word – over the salary quoted in the television advert. Although the salary isn’t the main concern for many would-be teachers there are no doubt some that do need to be reminded that it isn’t a reason to ignore a career in teaching, even if the squeeze on public sector pay does make it a less attractive reason that a few years ago. This is despite what the DfE says about the still attractive pension arrangements for teachers.

The second area where there has been some publicity has been over the issue of recruitment controls. On October the 27th, when the allocations were announced, this blog pointed out that far too many places had been allocated to PE providers and that “PE and history course providers on the other hand seem almost certain to be subject to recruitment controls, at least in some parts of the country.” And so, despite the government denial of early November, it has come to pass. And to that list must be added English and primary phase courses for postgraduates.

Now, the oxygen of publicity may have brought new applicants or it may just have inspired potential applicants to hurry up with their application and, no doubt, to bombard their referee with a request to fill in the reference forthwith. Indeed, I wonder if a dilatory tutor and their institution might find at least a grievance, if not something more serious, filed against them if a student missed the opportunity of being considered for a place on a course because the reference was delayed without due reason.

I think some universities may have been slow to take on board the implications of recruitment controls as laid out by the NCTL in their original explanation and may now be facing the consequences. My anxiety, despite what some DfE and NCTL officials may think, was never with the universities, but for applicants.

As the government is the purchaser of teacher preparation courses, they have the right to determine what method they use to purchase places. After all, it is QTS they are purchasing and to that universities offer their own establishment based qualification.  For applicants, it is more of a challenge, especially if they don’t know from one day to the next whether a course will be even able to interview them.

This state of affairs could have been prevented by creating a closing date by which all applicants that had applied would have been considered and any recruitment controls applied at that stage.  That would have prevented a first come first served approach that neither encourages quality in selection nor accepts that some applicants may have legitimate reasons for applying later in the recruitment round.

Still, we must not forget that beyond the subjects with recruitment controls there are a whole host of other subjects where recruitment remains a challenge. How much of a challenge would be easier to assess if the daily UCAS figures had a number for the total of applicants disaggregated from their number of applications. It is important to know whether recruitment controls are affecting the number of choices applicants make at the start of the process.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Recruitment Controls 4

  1. I attended an interview for a primary PGCE course (university based) on Wednesday 27th January 2016. The interview process lasted all day and included 2 x 30 minute observations, a formal interview, a written test and a numeracy test. It was both gruelling and stressful but worth it if it meant I was in with a shout of pursuing a career as a teacher. Today (Monday 1st February) I was advised that none of us (I believe there were 15 candidates) would be offered a place on the course as the limit for university based primary PGCE places has now been reached and is consequently closed! How can this be allowed to happen? Surely universities should be allowed to complete the interview process once they have started it! As for me, I feel dejected and cheated!! A total waste of my time, effort and money. After speaking with DfE and UCAS no one could advise me why the university could not complete the interview process. We are 15 human beings, aspiring to be teachers; we are not statistics that can merely be removed from a database because full capacity has been reached!

    • Dear Amy,

      I am very sorry and distressed to hear of your experience and I suggest you write a letter to your MP and to the Secretary of State for Education. i suspect that the University had a recruitment cap imposed possibly after your interview day was completed. However, it has always been possible for some candidates that go through the process not to be accepted if say there were only five places left and ten candidates. Have you had any luck with your other choices?

      John Howson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s