An oath for teachers?

Labour’s suggestion of teachers taking an oath on entering profession is an interesting idea. One reason to embrace it is that it would mean the word teacher would became a reserved term that could only be used by those prepared to take the oath unlike at present when anyone can call themselves a teacher regardless of their qualification, lack of them. However, taking an oath guarantees nothing as the history of medical and legal malpractice cases testifies. While it may be useful to help those that haven’t thought of the professionalism and associated values of being a teacher it can be ignored by anyone with predetermined intentions to misbehave. But, I cannot be too negative. I took an oath on becoming a magistrate and it was a solemn occasion.  Similarly, I have witnessed the oath taking of police officers at attestation ceremonies and explained to them why it was so important.

If there is to be an oath who is to administer it? Police, army, even medics all work for organisations with a national structure and with other professional bodies there are organisations, whether Inns of court, the Law Society or other professional bodies, but the General Teaching Council for England was abolished by this government in a short-sighted move allegedly linked to a supposed bonfire of Quangos. Without a professional body it seems unlikely that teachers would be prepared to swear an oath of professional virtue to the State, especially if they were working in the private sector.

The situation may well be different in Singapore where the oath-taking procedure was apparently spotted by Labour. Realistically, if it is about enhancing the status of teachers and making them more professional then returning power to the profession in return for enhanced status may not be enough. Professions don’t generally go on strike, so is Labour also signalling that teachers should sign away any rights to industrial action with no corresponding control over their earnings that would still be set either by the government of the management of individual schools?

I think most teachers already have a strong sense of public duty and a wish to serve the young people that they teach. After all, there may well be easier ways of earning a living for many graduates than the long hours and relentless term-time working life where the pace of teaching doesn’t differ from day to day as patterns of working do in most other professions.

On balance, I think the oath idea probably won’t fly unless Labour’s friends in the trade unions are prepared to endorse it. I am sure that they won’t do so without testing the strength of feeling among their members. Now a Queen’s Medal and long-service awards might be another matter. And while we are at it, perhaps the creation of some Regis Professors of Education might enhance the status of the profession in higher education.


2 thoughts on “An oath for teachers?

  1. You said “I think most teachers already have a strong sense of public duty and a wish to serve the young people that they teach. ”

    So why, as they say in Zen, put legs on a snake? Mr Hunt may as well simply say up front what politicians seem to think; “I believe you are a bunch of skivers and I don’t trust you, so I want you on oath, and then I can sack you more easily”. Many of the establishment have recently been shown to be morally lax and unable to live up to their responsibilities of office. How did oaths of office help? Perhaps Mr Hunt is feeling the strain.

    For several years, I was a school governor. I stopped going to their “Pub Quiz” after the third successive occasion when a member of the winning table got up and said “Yah boo, we beat you and this just shows that teachers are useless”. There is an attitude problem with teaching in England; the public have the attitude and teachers get the problem. Politicians can then ride the wave of public sentiment and laugh all the way to the next great con.

    As a former Trade Union (boo hiss) rep, I can tell you what banning strikes will do; staff in banned professions (it sounds “Apartheid”) will go sick more often (genuinely and in pretence), will die in harness more often, and be invalided out younger. Enforcing a loyalty oath will be legally very difficult, and will generate resentment, with a similar result. Teachers are bullied enough, as the “OxBOW” affair a decade ago showed .

    I DON’T trust oaths and the hypocrites who utter them. I DO respect those that try to expand the world of the younger people in their charge. When more people show such respect there will be no need for this nonsense. If nothing changes, who will make the effort to teach, at all, in 10 years’ time?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s