Some might call it a success!

My first thought was to head this piece ‘The triumph of hope over reality’, but I thought that a bit unfair. Nevertheless, the fact that the much trailed ‘Troops to Teachers’ scheme has recruited just 102 entrants into teacher training over two years, when the government has said in answer to a Parliamentary Question put on 6th March 2013 that they were planning to be able to support 1,000 entrants from that route on either School Direct Salaried or Training courses, does raise some questions.

Now those leaving the forces have often ended up in education. For many years Warrant Officers and NCOs leaving with a pension have taken their skills into the further education sector, and some officers similarly leaving with a pension have become bursars, mostly in the independent sector. So, were the government policymakers expecting these leavers to switch to mainstream teaching or had they indentified a group of earlier leavers from the army that might be attracted into teaching? I am sure someone in either the DfE or the NCTL asked the question; how many leavers of a graduate level or with the skills to acquire a degree leave the army each year; and how many might want to teach? I assume you can leave aside most of the specialist trades and professions within the army as they would normally head back into law, medicine, the church, or whatever trade, skill or vocation they had used in the army.

So, did that leave mostly the infantry and the gunners as the main source of potential teachers? I don’t know what the number of graduate level leavers there are each year from these two branches of the army, but I doubt it is anywhere near 1,000 even every two years. As a result, 61 this year might just be a good haul from the possible pool. I have been told that around 1,000 expressed an interest, and 300 were possibly eligible, so a one in six conversion rate for those eligible compares with a conversion rate per place of about 3.3 for higher education secondary courses according to one source in the comments to an earlier post on this blog.  

Now I suppose that there were those that felt former army personnel would have the necessary grasp of discipline to be able to deal with behaviour management: as if hormonal teenagers were no different to young soldiers. Personally, I think it more to do with the personal qualities any occupational group that works mostly with people requires. Those from such groups often make good teachers because they understand the need to relate to others. It is also why teachers make such attractive employees to other employers, a fact we should not overlook as the economy expands and business look for graduates with the inter-personal skills teachers have in abundance.

The question that needs asking is, who was responsible for talking up the possible delivery target for the ‘Troops to Teachers’ scheme, and did a Minister accepted the figures without asking any questions? If so, what was their special adviser doing?



2 thoughts on “Some might call it a success!

  1. If I have understood it correctly there are two routes for Troops to Teachers: those with degrees (mainly from before joining up) follow the standard SD route – these will generally be officers – and recruiting from this pool ought to just be a marketing and support issue to get them ready for SD (GTP regularly and successfully picked these up before SD); the second group are those with the equivalent of HND (maybe HND, maybe OU undergrad modules, maybe something equivalent) who do a unique course co-ordinated by Brighton University where they are employed by a school 4 days/week and complete modules to achieve a degree and QTS on the other day and across a series of residential weeks. The whole thing takes two years and they are supernumerary in their first year and take on a reduced teaching load in their second. These will generally be NCOs and could have any background but STEM subjects will be appropriate for those from technical trades (lots of electrical and mechanical trades in all three armed forces, and loads of finance and logistics jobs), PE for PT instructors, there are regimental musicians, intelligence analysts, cartographers, etc. etc. I think Brighton have, rightly, applied pretty high standards in the recruitment process hence the high rejection rate. I could be wrong but I think the 1000s includes SD and the 61 is just the route for those without a full degree so maybe your figures don’t quite catch the full picture. Nonetheless there is a massive question to be asked about the cost per head; I have heard that the costs for this route are well into the miliions, although I have no direct knowledge, but I would be surprised if it’s not a lot more expensive than Teach First, for example. On the positive side, the little bit of feedback from schools I’ve heard suggests these trainees are going to be really cracking teachers. So, DfE comes up with good idea, wildly over-estimates the number of teachers it will recruit, and throws a load of money at it – like SD^2 maybe?

  2. Thanks for the update. The non-graduate route was really like a repackaged Registered Teacher programme the unknown sibling of the Graduate Teacher Programme which gave those with Dip-HE equivalent qualifications the opportunity to train and earn a degree. It really had its origins in the 2+2 degree structure of some early BEds.

    The up-front costs of Teach First are relatively high – see post a bout a year ago where I discussed the cost per trainee recruited from the data in their accounts.

    So, as you say, and I think I agree, ‘DfE comes up with good idea, wildly over-estimates the number of teachers it will recruit, and throws a load of money at it’. That happened even when the TDA had a Board to monitor what was going on. Think what happens no there is no external check like that on the expenditure of public money.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s